So, does the hardware outperforms the Raspberry Pi 5?
The answer is yes; as the article title suggests, here are four reasons why this compact Intel SBC surpasses the Raspberry Pi 5 board. Here’s a clearer and more streamlined breakdown of the five reasons the LattePanda IOTA SBC outshines the Raspberry Pi 5:
🥇 1. Superior CPU Performance
- Processor: Intel N150 SoC with 4 Gracemont E-cores
- Clock Speed: Boosts up to 3.6 GHz
- Benchmark Advantage: Outperforms Raspberry Pi 5 in Geekbench 6 (single-core and multi-core)
🎨 2. Exceptional GPU Power
- Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics with up to 1000 MHz
- Performance: Delivers 10–30× better GPU throughput than RPi 5
- Use Cases: Ideal for media playback, light gaming, and graphical applications
🔌 3. Advanced Connectivity & Expansion
- Ports: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps), HDMI 2.1 (4K @ 60Hz), Gigabit Ethernet
- Expansion: M.2 slot for SSDs or wireless modules
- Bonus: RP2040 co-processor for real-time I/O tasks (e.g., robotics, sensors)
🖥️ 4. Full x86 OS Compatibility
- Operating Systems: Runs Windows 10/11, Ubuntu, and other x86 Linux distros
- Flexibility: Supports mainstream software and development tools without ARM limitations
Performance Comparison
This is a performance comparison between the LattePanda IOTA (16GB RAM) and the Raspberry Pi 5 (16GB RAM), using the latest Geekbench 6 scores and GPU benchmarks from GFXBench.
Key highlights
The LattePanda IOTA clearly excels in raw performance, particularly for multi-core tasks and GPU-intensive workloads, while the Raspberry Pi 5, based on ARM architecture, is more power-efficient.
Feature | LattePanda IOTA (16GB) | Raspberry Pi 5 (16GB) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 6 Single-Core Score | 1250 | 850 |
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core Score | 4200 | 2300 |
GPU Performance (GFXBench T-Rex Offscreen) | 45 fps | 25 fps |
CPU Architecture | Intel N100 (x86) | Broadcom BCM2712 (ARM) |
GPU Type | Intel UHD Graphics | VideoCore VII |
Power Consumption | ~6W idle / ~15W load | ~3W idle / ~10W load |
📊 Chart Highlights
- Geekbench 6 Single-Core Score: LattePanda IOTA leads with 1250 vs Raspberry Pi 5’s 850.
- Geekbench 6 Multi-Core Score: LattePanda IOTA scores 4200, nearly double Raspberry Pi 5’s 2300.
- GPU performance (GFXBench T-Rex Offscreen): LattePanda IOTA achieves 45 fps, surpassing the Raspberry Pi 5’s 25 fps.

How does it perform for gaming?
From a user and buyer perspective, it’s important to stay realistic—don’t expect too much from $130 hardware. If you’re aiming to run resource-intensive games, it’s better to explore more high-end boards like the LattePanda 2 Alpha, LattePanda 3 Delta, or LattePanda Mu, as they are designed for more demanding applications.
Here’s a detailed hardware comparison between the two boards:
🧩 Key Takeaway:
For high-end use, the LattePanda 2 Alpha shines with its superior CPU performance, while the LattePanda 3 Delta impresses with enhanced connectivity, faster memory, and more advanced features.
Feature | LattePanda 2 Alpha | LattePanda 3 Delta |
---|---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5-8210Y (2-core, 4-thread, up to 3.6GHz) | Intel Celeron N5105 (4-core, 4-thread, up to 2.9GHz) |
CPU Benchmark | ~690 (Cinebench R20) | ~793 (Cinebench R20) |
RAM | 8GB LPDDR3 1600MHz | 8GB LPDDR4 2933MHz |
Storage | 64GB eMMC | 64GB eMMC |
Wireless | WiFi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.2 | WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.2 |
USB Ports | 3× USB 3.0 Type-A, 1× USB-C | 3× USB 3.2 Type-A, 1× USB-C |
Video Output | HDMI (up to 4K), DP via USB-C, eDP | HDMI 2.0 (up to 4K HDR), DP via USB-C, eDP |
Expansion Slots | M.2 Key E (WiFi/BT), M.2 Key M (NVMe SSD) | M.2 Key B (4G/5G/SATA), M.2 Key M (NVMe SSD), M.2 Key E |
GPIO Co-Processor | Arduino Leonardo (ATmega32U4) | Arduino Leonardo (ATmega32U4) |
Operating System | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10/11, Linux |
Dimensions | 115mm × 78mm × 14mm | 125mm × 78mm × 16mm |